... no es sinónimo de evidencia sólida.
Referencias:
Referencias:
1. Brok J, Thorlund K, Gluud C, Wetterslev J. Trial
sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false
positive results in many meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;
61:763-769.
2. Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C.
Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive - Trial sequential
analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of
accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses.
International Journal of Epidemiology 2009; 38:287-298.
3. Thorlund
K, Devereaux PJ, Wetterslev J, Guyatt G, Ioannidis JP, Thabane L, et al. Can
trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from
meta-analyses? International Journal of Epidemiology 2009; 38:276-286.
4. Thorlund
K, Imberger G, Walsh M, Chu
R, Gluud C, Wetterslev
J, et al. The number
of patients and events required to limit the risk of overestimation of
intervention effects in meta-analysis- a simulation study. PLoS One. 2011;
6(10):e25491.
5. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K,
Brok J, Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is
reached in cumulative meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
2008;61:64-75.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario