martes, 10 de febrero de 2015

GRADE en Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Referencias:

1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knotterus A. GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64 (4): 380–82.

2. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl E, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64 (4): 383–94

3. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64 (4): 395-400.

4. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines 3: rating the quality of evidence - introduction. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64 (4): 401-6.

5. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines 4: rating the quality of evidence - risk of bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64 (4): 407-15.

6. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines 5: rating the quality of evidence - publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64 (12): 1277-82.

7. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence - imprecision.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64 (12): 1283-93.

8. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M; The GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence - inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64 (12): 1294-1302.

9. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M; The GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence - indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64 (12): 1303-10.

10. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P; The GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64 (12): 1311-16.

11. Brunetti M, Shemilt I, Pregno S, Vale L, Oxman AD, Lord J; The GRADE Working. GRADE guidelines: 10. Rating the quality of evidence for resource use. J Clin Epidemiology. 2013; 66(2):140-50.

12. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66(2):151-7.

13. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Santesso N, Helfand M, Vist G, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables-binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66(2):158-72.

14. Guyatt GH, Thorlund K, Oxman AD, Walter SD, Patrick D, Furukawa TA, et al. GRADE guidelines 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables-continuous outcomes. J Clin Epidemiology 2013; 66(2):173-83.

15. Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Alderson P, Dahm P, Falck-Ytter Y, et al. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66(7):719-25.


16. Andrews JC, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Pottie K, Meerpohl JJ, Coello PA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66(7): 726-35. 

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario